- Where is the serial number on swarovski binoculars full size#
- Where is the serial number on swarovski binoculars full#
It seems likely the numbering pattern is as follows: So taking into account what Swarovski wants to accomplish with it’s serial numbering - and on the basis of the information available at this stage. EL 10x42: KD10 10130A (vs K9007 47700: dating from February - the 7th week of 2020 - add 1930 and being the 7,700th unit in a sequence starting from 40,000).
Where is the serial number on swarovski binoculars full#
Jan has provided the following examples (I asked him to send me the full details of the other 2 units on hand): Now after 29 years, from September 2020 there is a new form of numbering: AA+7+A units where during servicing SONA replaced the part with the original serial number units made in Austria but assemble by SONA/ Swarovski Optik North America (which to date have been certain lines of telscopic sights), and 'A' was used for both Habicht CF Porro binoculars and NL x42 roof prism onesįinally, the alternate form of AA+7 was used to distinguish: The ranges distinguished between different product types that had the same starting letter e.g.
Where is the serial number on swarovski binoculars full size#
from 40,000 to 49,999 for full size roof prism binoculars and from 20,000 to 29,999 for telescopes There were 3 different ones for binoculars and 1 each for hand held electronics, telescopes and telescopic sightsĮ.g. the use of limited number ranges depending on the product type a dating component (it always identifies the year of production, and often also the week of the year), andĪdditionally, since October 2011 there’s been a 4th component: a product or product line identifier (a letter) Swarovski includes various types of information in it’s serial numberingĪll A-N numbering has a minimum of 3 components:
Introduced in 1985 on a limited basis, in various forms.So rather than going into a lot of detail, I’ll attempt to provide just enough information to make sense of the new numberingĪlpha-Numeric numbering (as opposed to purely numeric numbering) was: I’ve previously posted in detail about Swarovski’s current numbering practices - at least as they were until the the end of August 2020 So revising the pattern of the numbering is an opportunity to address the above Can’t you get me a new one?Īlso, from September 1991 Swarovski used 2 forms of numbering (as explained below)Īnd finally, a modification - and limitation - to the consecutive numbering component was introduced in 2011 (again see below) Īs I’ve noted before, the main form of dating that specified both the year and week of manufacture seemed to create unnecessary anxiety for some intending purchasersĪnd it must have on occasion been a nuisance for retailers: along the lines of ‘Hey this one’s 2 (or 4 or 6 or whatever) months old. Well that’s an interesting development, though not necessarily a totally unexpected one.